I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
随后又翻出来一件黄色卫衣，他说，那是一个很有门面的经理送的，穿出去体面。说完，又低头把衣服上的拉链抻了抻。阿妈说，“结婚的时候，都没见他这么认真打扮”。
。关于这个话题，同城约会提供了深入分析
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved